User talk:Саня Новиков

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Саня Новиков!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Вики любит памятники 2015

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

• File:Костомаровский Спасский монастырь - 1.jpg
• File:Костомаровский Спасский монастырь - 2.jpg
• File:Успенский Горицкий монастырь - 2.jpg
• File:Церковь Сицилийской иконы Божией Матери - 2.jpg
• File:Церковь пещерная Иоанна Предтечи - 1.jpg

оказались среди 1083 из почти 24 тысяч загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015

Мосты

Здравствуйте, Саня, я откатил несколько десятков ваших правок: не следует добавлять к файлам категорию "железнодорожные мосты", если они уже находятся в категории какого-либо из железнодорожных мостов (например Category:Yaroslavl railway bridge) см. COM:OVERCAT. Надеюсь, вы не обидитесь, в остальном ваш вклад полезен и качествен :) --A.Savin 01:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Да, действительно, не до конца разобрался с деревом категорий. Дико извиняюсь за доставленные неудобства. Саня Новиков (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Утки на Набережной - 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Утки на Набережной - 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Утки на Набережной - 2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Именование некоторых статей

Здравствуйте! Поскольку вы создали в русской Википедии статью о географическом объекте с укороченным названием Чистоозёрное (озеро, Тамбовская область), приглашаю вас ознакомиться с материалами по теме топонимов-прилагательных, собранными вот здесь.

Верю, что вы хотите сделать Википедию лучше и при этом не навредить русскому языку. Ознакомившись с источниками по ссылке, вы убедитесь, что ваша статья «Чистоозёрное (озеро, Тамбовская область)» на литературном русском языке должна называться «Чистоозёрное озеро (Тамбовская область)» либо «Чистое озеро (Тамбовская область)». В подобных случаях усечённые названия статей об озёрах и других физико-географических объектах противоречат главными принципам именования статей: узнаваемость, естественность, точность (см. правила именования статей).

Почему нельзя выбрасывать слово «озеро», «бухта» или «гора» из словосочетаний с названиями-прилагательными? Ответ простой: потому что в таких названиях существует прочная синтаксическая связь между словами, так устроена русская речь (и не только русская).

Названия объектов на географических картах и в табличных списках не являются связным текстом, поэтому такие источники не годятся для обоснования отбрасывания нарицательных определяемых слов при топонимах-прилагательных. Посмотрите для примера, как называются статьи о заливах и бухтах в Крыму. А вот названия энциклопедических статей об озёрах в «Большой российской энциклопедии»:

• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/1854478
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/4186396
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/4181116
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/3528565
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/1877063

Спасибо. Всего доброго. — 2A00:1370:810C:9747:A1FE:F585:3AB2:7003 23:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway Bridge in Rasskazovo - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Rasskazovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot-air balloon - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin in Rasskazovo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments How old is the statue? --C messier 21:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC) @C messier: This is a typical soviet sculpture of Vladimir Lenin, but I haven't any ideas about author and creation date. Alexander Novikov 14:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Panteleimon the Healer - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Adoscam 22:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berezka-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 22:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pokrovo-Prigorodnoe-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 22:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squirrel in Friendship Park - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USSR street sign - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USSR shop sign - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 19:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a bit soft in the background (more contrast might have been better) --Michielverbeek 09:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Xopolino 19:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Xopolino 19:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 08:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Summary/Description in these 5 images could be more specific and descriptive, mentioning what each image depicts. --Tagooty 03:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Done More specific description added. Alexander Novikov 06:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 23:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dagestan-015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dagestan-015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amusement Park in Tambov - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amusement Park in Tambov - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amusement Park in Tambov - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofs of Tambov - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice framing and background. Neck could be a bit sharper, but good quality overall. If the pigeon had been superbly sharp all over and the photo were perhaps 2.5 times as big in resolution with the same composition, it could have been an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 10:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residential building on Komsomolskaya Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 09:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --KartikiGonsalves 02:56, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most beautiful building, but quality is good --Michielverbeek 19:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staraya Titovka - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staraya Titovka - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staraya Titovka - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ximonic 22:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak support. IMO noise reduction could be better. --XRay 13:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicherin Estate - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание губернской земской управы - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Terragio67 03:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lermontov Square in Tambov - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A red-linked Category should be corrected. --Tagooty 16:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Thank you for review, red link corrected. Alexander Novikov 21:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aseev Estate - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A red-linked Category should be corrected. --Tagooty 16:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Thank you for review, red link corrected. Alexander Novikov 21:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 21:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Comment Very nice capture. There seems to be a very small dust spot to the right of the second level of the tower. -- Ikan Kekek 02:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thank you, I fixed it. Alexander Novikov 09:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 16:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murmansk-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me, but focus might have been a bit more to the left --Michielverbeek 22:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although I think it should say 'goal' rather than 'gate'? --BigDom 15:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC) I fixed it, thank you :-) Alexander Novikov 18:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:13, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Transfiguration Cathedral FP nomination

Hello Alexander,

with my remarks about the chromatic aberrations (CAs) I did not want to spoil your nomination. CAs can be removed from photos; it’s easier when you have got a raw image file (in your case, a CR2 or CR2 file), but it is also possible when you have taken the photograph in JPEG format. Your photo of the Transfiguration Cathedral is good, it certainly deserves the additional work to remove (or at least reduce) the CAs. If you need help with editing the photo, just ask, I am sure that somebody can help you (I would do it myself, but I am quite busy right now).

Best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 10:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)